Today is musical theater day with emphasis placed on the music, influence, and significance of Leonard Bernstein. Bernstein's music is understood better by an understanding of his worldview and his genius. As a first-class pianist, conductor, author, speaker, and composer, Leonard Bernstein's complete brilliance including originality, creativity, and personal charisma found an audience that reached an entire world. While his legacy may be the Overture to Candide, which happens to be the most played orchestral work in the world, and the music from West Side Story, it is in the areas of music theater, symphonies, choral music, and chamber music that he excelled.
But the music cannot be understood without addressing Bernstein's worldview and the philosophy that led to his eclecticism. His commitment to writing music that could relate to all age groups, religions, cultures, and nationalities gave him a type of universal religion not far from a variation of pantheism. This unusual collectivism gave his music a blend of sophistication mixed with popular culture. Musicians embracing music primarily for entertainment often find Bernstein's music to be overly-complicated, academic, and unusual. Cultivated musicians, conversely, often believe Bernstein's music is geared for a wide audience and therefore leans on the simplistic side and is given to cultural idioms of the time period.
Ironically, in a way, these criticisms are justified particularly when one studies only pockets of Bernstein's output. Yet taken as a whole, Bernstein's music is extraordinary in its complexity, beauty, energy, and creativity. It is perhaps his Mass, written for the opening of the Kennedy Center, that demonstrates his eclectic spirit as well as his controversial originality. We listened to several part of this engaging work, and I pointed out the usage of mixed meter, rock inflections, jazz idioms, and the religious qualities of the work. I encourage you to acquire a recording and listen to it; yet I also must qualify that it contains some inappropriate language. The work is guaranteed to make someone upset! But it also contains beautiful and shimmering music that exemplifies his style and his philosophy.
We listened to Chichester Psalms, part of Symphony No. 2, and a few measures of Prelude, Fugue, and Riffs. These selections demonstrate mastery of harmony, counterpoint, melody, and orchestra. They further show Bernstein's eclectic incorporation of jazz idioms, religious worldview, and dramatic emotional content. We concluded our Bernstein discussion with a brief look at West Side Story and his love of music theater.
The next few minutes we discussed Gershwin, Richard Rodgers, Jerome Kern, Frederick Lowe, Andrew Loyd Webber, and Cole Porter. Obviously many others contributed to American music theater, which may be a form of opera, and Broadway continues to be a vital part of American culture today. We spent a few minutes discussing the role of harmony in music theater with the reminder that songs containing rich harmony tend to "rise" to the top as music and withstand the test of time for excellence.
We now jump backwards to the Renaissance for a couple of days of discussion of polyphony and development. It promises to be fun for all!
Friday, September 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What a great class. Wouldn't it be lovely to have a whole semester to devote to the subject? Was just playing some Gershwin tunes on flute last evening, and attended a Marble Falls High School Choir Department fund raiser where several of these composers were represented...notably several songs from Wicked.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the Bernstein piece for boy soprano: it was beautiful at the beginning. I found it interesting, though, that the harsh theme didn't bother me until it was melded with the beautiful theme. It changed character completely, it seemed to me, and became something that sounded as if a whip was being cracked on someone's back. Weird. Disturbing.
I loved the way Bernstein took such different and very independent melodies and juxtaposed them. Alone you would never think they could work together and then they do. Its beautiful.
ReplyDeleteBernstein's mass is very interesting, but I would argue that it is just too eclectic to withstand the test of time. There is no doubt that it is worth studying and ingenious, but I think he put too many different things in it.
ReplyDelete--Olivia
I'm not sure how a pieces diversity can keep it from resisting the test of time. I think that this will continue to be studied as long as we remember Bernstein as a composer worth studying. Even if this piece is in some way unimportant on its own, Bernstein is definitely important making this at least an important footnote.
ReplyDelete-Stephen
I'm not sure. I tend to agree with Olivia, but I can also see where Stephen is coming from. True that alone I think it would be cast aside, I think more than anything else, the facts that it has an interesting story and is of Bernstein will be the reasons for its being studied in the future.
ReplyDelete~Kandice